- Feb 06, 2015
-
-
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by:Jo-Philipp Wich <jow@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 44294
-
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
The package index is generated on first use anyway, therefore it makes no sense to continue shipping it. Also sstrip the bundled host binaries when packing the IB to save some additional space. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Imre Kaloz authored
Signed-off-by:Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 44291
-
Imre Kaloz authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by:
-
- Feb 05, 2015
-
-
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Instead of hardcoding /bin/bash, use /usr/bin/env bash - this fixes the build on FreeBSD 10.1. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Perl might not be present while checking prereqs, e.g. on a fresh FreeBSD install. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Bash is not guaranteed to be present, e.g. on a fresh FreeBSD install so perform prereq tests with /bin/sh. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
They're part of prereq-build.mk now. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Those tests are part of prereq-build.mk now. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Also move tests from tools/Makefile and include/host.mk here to have all tests in a central place. Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Signed-off-by: -
Jo-Philipp Wich authored
Those macros allow testing various commands on the host system, also process the prereq tests in the order they're declared. Signed-off-by: -
Imre Kaloz authored
Signed-off-by: -
Imre Kaloz authored
In order for the image to be built, some patches need to be ported to 3.19. Add the relevant patches. Note that most of them (if not all) should be merged in 3.20, removing the need to carry them on then. Signed-off-by:
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
All the boards but Mamba had wrong UBI options so far, making it impossible to flash the built image on their respective storage medium. Fix all of the supported boards in order to make the generated images useful. Tested on a Mirabox, an Armada XP GP and an Openblocks AX3, and used the NAND chip datasheet for the others. Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
Some boards only come with a small NOR on it, where UBI isn't a good solution because of its overhead. Add a new subprofile for such boards, that rely on the mtd split framework instead. Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
While we supported only the NAND so far, some boards use a large enough NOR, where UBI is the only reasonable option. Create a new sub-profile template with a different set of UBI options. Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
In order to support the various board NAND layout that we support, introduce a sub-profile similar to the one used by ar71xx. These subprofiles provide a default implementation for most of the building functions, while allowing each sub-profile to override any of these operations in order to have a more specific behaviour, like Mamba expects for example. Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
Some devices out there only have a NOR flash to store the rootfs on. While using UBI is arguable on this kind of flash, this is something that should be supported. Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Kaloz authored
We're going to need the MTD split related options for our NOR support. Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Thill authored
Signed-off-by:Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org> SVN-Revision: 44258
-
- Feb 04, 2015
-
-
John Crispin authored
The mt76 driver might have some problem working with MT7602. MT7602 should not have VHT capabilities . But the driver not identity properly. Signed-off-by:wengbj <fl.service@t-firefly.com> SVN-Revision: 44257
-
John Crispin authored
requested and tested by forum user OWonPi https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=55495 Signed-off-by:
Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirchen@web.de> SVN-Revision: 44256
-
John Crispin authored
This device is very similar to the TL-WR841N v8, only two LED GPIOs are different. Signed-off-by:Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net> SVN-Revision: 44255
-
